Dear Mr. Tegulle:
I publish the blog Male Circumcision and HIV (http://www.circumcisionandhiv.com/) in the United States. I m writing to request permission to reprint in its entirety the above entitled article. If this is not possible, I understand. I can also write a few paragraphs paraphrasing your points and link to your article in the Sunday Monitor and to your personal website.
Thanks,
DAVID WILTON
(415) 669-4059 - text or voice
http://www.circumcisionandhiv.com/
I have read your article today in the monitor and found it ery unlike you .
While you always write good articles for the saturday column that I enjoy I thouhgt Ishould let you know that you were off the mark for today.
Circumcision is not said to protect people from HIV it only promotes hygiene and may protect against HIV only to a limited extent.That is the message going out and if individuals misunderstand this as 1005 protection the question should be .\:
Mr. Tegulle, this country needs more people with ability to ask the question WHY, in many policies and discoveries. Thank you.
My name is MUGAMBWA Everest Kizito, the Information Education and Communications Officer (IECO)-NEMA Uganda. I have enjoyed your discussions, both on TV and in the newspapers for some time but this particular one is one of those I would like to call a master piece
Mark Lyndon:Good for you! Circumcision is a dangerous distraction in the fight against AIDS. There are six African countries where men are more likely to be HIV+ if they've been circumcised: Cameroon, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Rwanda, and Swaziland. Eg in Malawi, the HIV rate is 13.2% among circumcised men, but only 9.5% among intact men. In Rwanda, the HIV rate is 3.5% among circumcised men, but only 2.1% among intact men.
Dear Gawaya Tegulle,
I was very impressed by the Opinion piece you wrote in "The Monitor" concerning circumcision and HIV. I am writing to share with you more information on this subject.
It is inappropriate for the WHO and UNAIDS to be promoting circumcision on men
in Africa to allegedly prevent HIV, especially among groups whose Christian faith does not require circumcision and who are warned against it in the New
Testament. In the previous century, all sorts of medical excuses were used by U.S. physicians to promote routine circumcision in the U.S.
Hello Mr Tegulle,
You rational careful opposition to circumcision is manna to the ears.
As a Canadian nurse who has opposed it for fifty years and is on the brink of re-publishing a website (which was destroyed by a web-host who disagreed with me although took payment fo r first publishing the site) I am thrilled to hear people standing up for their rights and especially for their vulnerable childrens' rights.
From Saad Angrie
You make generalisations and false statements about circumcision and Aids. Researchers/scientists have never said that circumcision will help protect men from contracting HIV – the virus that causes Aids. They say that circumcising adult men can dramatically lower their risk of becoming infected by HIV through heterosexual sex. Let me be clear: The high safety standards in air travel, for example, dramatically reduce the chance of crashing but that does not mean that aircraft never crash. It is as simple as that.